3/23/2023 0 Comments Memory monitor firefoxAs they’re very popular these days, it’s also possible to load custom profiles for Firefox or Chrome portable versions. Upon running the portable executable, SpeedyFox automatically detects and loads the default profile for each of the supported applications. It also supports the Mozilla Thunderbird and Skype tools as well. In addition to Firefox which it was originally designed for, SpeedyFox can now also compact the databases for the Chrome, Epic Browser, SRWare Iron and Pale Moon browsers. SpeedyFox is a tool designed specifically for compacting the SQLite database files which will in turn reduce the time taken to read from and write to them. Here are 3 useful tools to optimize the Chrome and Firefox SQLite database files and help reduce the memory they use while open. Although not such a big problem with performance unless your computer doesn’t have a great deal of memory, optimizing the memory for the browser reduces overheads and leaves more memory available for other programs. A database gets fragmented over time and optimizing it decreases read and write times. Also if Firefox is left open for several hours, consumed memory of well over a Gigabyte is not uncommon even with only a few tabs open, a long running memory leak issue that plagues Firefox sometimes.Ī useful way to regain a bit of the lost performance in Firefox and Chrome is to compact the SQLite databases they use. This is a very common problem and occurs partly because of fragmentation in the databases Chrome and Firefox both use. Even though both have done work in this area, a lot of people still complain these browsers use far more memory than they should.Īs the browser gets used, slowly it will take more time to load during startup, the overall speed might decrease, and browsing thorough the history will start to slow down. Add in a few of the 1,000’s of extensions available and your browser could soon consume hundreds of Megabytes of memory and take up large amounts of disc space. Over time they have both increased in the amount of features, and consequently the amount of system resources they consume while running. It would be useful to have a listing of each site open in a content process, as it may help analyze why RAM usage shot through the roof.Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome are by far the most popular third party web browsers around. One issues with Firefox’s memory usage listing on the page is that there is no indication about the sites that are open in any given content process. Chrome however has options to end a process right from within the Task Manager, and it lists network and cpu use of each process on top of that. ![]() The new feature is comparable to Chrome’s Task Manager which lists memory use and process IDs as well. While there is no option to deal with a process right from the about:performance page, you may open the Task Manager to locate and kill a misbehaving process using its ID this should not have any effect on the parent process or other processes used by Firefox. If you have not changed the number of processes, you get one parent process and another that is used for the content listed on the page.Įach content process is listed with its process ID which makes identification easier. ![]() Mozilla landed a new feature in Firefox 51 Nightly recently that lists the memory usage of each process in the browser itself.Īll you need to do is load about:performance in Firefox to get a listing of each process, and the memory it uses. Mozilla’s initial implementation uses about 20% more memory when compared to vanilla Firefox without multi-process enabled. The main reason for that decision is RAM usage, as it can quickly go out of hand. One core difference between Firefox’s multi-process architecture and that of Google Chrome is that Firefox will never use Chrome’s one process for every site system. The company plans to change that by adding more processes to Firefox.The feature needs to be stabilized first however as it is plagued by a couple of bugs currently.Īnother improvement that is still in the works is sandboxing which will improve security once it lands. Mozilla made the decision to roll out the new multi-process architecture with a single content process initially that is separated from the browser core. With multi-process Firefox slowly rolling out to stable channel installations of the browser, further work is done on improving the feature for all Firefox users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |